Author summary
8%6 analyzed articles/videos903 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carley Lanich results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 394 hits. Analysis detected 1,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,612 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 41% (5,442 of 9,158 authors). This Carley Lanich is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Carley Lanich
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
41%Carley Lanich (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,612
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.9%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate