Topic summary
36% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,221 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Primary Election results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 2,061 hits . Analysis detected 18,599 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,306 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (22,666 of 24,439 topics). This Primary Election is better (less manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Primary Election
Topic details
Total words: 32,306
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.3% percentile 1.1% BS Score12 analyzed articles32.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst