Author summary
61%2 analyzed articles/videos905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stranger Election Control Board results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 704 hits. Analysis detected 2,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,620 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,766 of 9,471 authors). This Stranger Election Control Board is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Stranger Election Control Board
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
50%Stranger Election Control Board (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,620
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 19.4%19.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.5%5.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.0%Red Herring: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos