Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Brittany Carloni results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 238 hits . Analysis detected 1,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,738 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,706 authors). This Brittany Carloni is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Brittany Carloni
Author details
Total words: 3,738
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Middle Ground: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1% Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst