Author summary
39% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,927 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simon D. Schuster results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Recency Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 1,106 hits . Analysis detected 5,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,180 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (7,786 of 8,538 authors). This Simon D. Schuster is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group. Simon D. Schuster
Author details
Total words: 14,180
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.8% percentile 1.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst