Author summary
13%7 analyzed articles/videos7,099 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordyn Hermani results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 1,310 hits. Analysis detected 10,352 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,640 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,519 of 8,611 authors). This Jordyn Hermani is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group.
Jordyn Hermani
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
2%Jordyn Hermani (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 32,640
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

1% percentile
02550751001.1% percentile
0.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles32.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate