Topic summary
91% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Law Enforcement Operations results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 2,849 hits . Analysis detected 26,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,477 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 57% (10,273 of 23,582 topics). This Law Enforcement Operations is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group. Law Enforcement Operations
Topic details
Total words: 21,477
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles21.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst