Publication summary
23% 40 analyzed articles/videos 26,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rough Draft Atlanta results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 8,167 hits . Analysis detected 48,765 faulty-reasoning hits from 108,078 analyzed words across 40 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 13% (477 of 548 publications). This Rough Draft Atlanta is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 108,078
Article count: 40
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.0% percentile 0.9% BS Score40 analyzed articles108.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst