Author summary
40% 2 analyzed articles/videos 953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ty Tagami results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 276 hits . Analysis detected 2,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,812 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 48% (4,481 of 8,541 authors). This Ty Tagami is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Ty Tagami
Author details
Total words: 3,812
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst