Student absenteeism a persistent problem, but Georgia is doing better than most states 21%

By Ty Tagami40% Capitol Beat40%

8/3/2026, 6:01:46 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 847 faulty-reasoning hits from 750 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (20,937 of 26,434 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the article peer group.

When COVID-19 struck, schools closed, students “attended” from home, and too many got out of the habit of going to school when the doors reopened. 
In 2022, nearly a quarter of Georgia’s students had absenteeism rates high enough to be considered “chronic”  nearly double the rate before the pandemic. 
But new data show that the state is gradually recovering. 
More students are still missing school than before COVID-19, but the rate has been steadily falling, dropping to 17.7% during the 2025-26 school year. 
That is nearly 2 percentage points lower than the prior year, which in turn was nearly 2 points lower than in 2023-24, the state data show. 
The rate remains more than 5 percentage points above the rates in the two years before the pandemic, but observers find Georgia’s trajectory to be promising, especially when many other states have found their absenteeism problems to be more stubborn. 
The Georgia Department of Education released the new rates last week, well ahead of most other states, noted Nat Malkus, with the American Enterprise Institute. 
“Perhaps even more impressively,” he wrote in an analysis published Thursday, “Georgia’s chronic absenteeism rate is declining steadily, bucking the national trend.” 
During the 2024-25 school year, Georgia’s chronic absenteeism rate was 19.5%, beating the estimated national average by more than 2 percentage points, according to the group FutureEd, whose numbers had Georgia among the third of the states with the lowest rates. 
“We applaud the Georgia Department of Education’s early release of end-of-the-year attendance data, which shows an impressive fifth consecutive year of decreased chronic absence,” Hedy Chang, president and CEO of the group Attendance Works, said in a statement. 
“Georgia’s commitment to timely end-of-the-year data is a model for how states can make a difference.” 
Some of that success came after lawmakers passed a law last year that required more coordinated and sustained efforts against absenteeism. 
Senate Bill 123 required that school districts with high rates create attendance review teams that engage parents. 
State lawmakers tried to build on that this year with Senate Bill 513. 
“If we do not have kids’ butts in seats, they are not going to learn,” Sen. 
RaShaun Kemp, D-Atlanta, said before the measure passed with just one vote against it in the Senate. 
But the measure faced overwhelming opposition in the House due to some provisions seen as draconian, including loss of driving privileges. 
Many students who skip a lot of school need their licenses so they can get to jobs  not to mention to school, critics said. 
Studies have shown that treating the problem with punishment does not work well, said Matt Smith, the policy and research director for the Georgia Partnership for Excellence in Education. 
Indeed, using punishment to address misbehavior in general can aggravate the absenteeism problem by turning school into an unwelcoming environment, he said. 
Out-of-school suspension, one such “legacy” strategy, directly increases absenteeism. 
Instead, Georgia schools are more often trying to address the underlying problems, he said. 
That started with more behavioral and mental health counseling. 
But poor physical health can also rob students of their ability to focus, which can in turn lead them to misbehave, he said, so more schools are looking at that too. 
“It could be something as simple as getting them hearing aids or glasses, getting them dental care,” he said. 
Smith said the data the state education department has been releasing allows more people, including businesses and organizations in each community, to help school districts identify commonalities among students who are missing a lot of school. 
That enables the districts to focus their resources on those students, and it allows the community to help. 
They have a reason to help. 
Research shows that absenteeism affects the whole classroom by bogging down teachers who must divide their students into different groups as they try to catch up the kids who have fallen behind, Smith said. 
Georgia and other states still have a lot of work to do to get their absenteeism rates back to a manageable level, Malkus wrote in his analysis. 
But he added that Georgia is showing how progress is possible when it is seen as an urgent priority. 
Many states take far longer than Georgia did to release their data from the prior school year, he wrote. 
“Indeed, there are some states  Minnesota and Texas among them  that still have not released data for the 2024–25 school year.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.9%Ty Tagami: 1.9%Rough Draft Atlanta: 1.2%Confirmation Bias2.9%This article: 6.8%Ty Tagami: 3.3%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.4%Anchoring Bias6.8%This article: 2.5%Ty Tagami: 2.8%Rough Draft Atlanta: 1.4%Availability Heuristic2.5%This article: 1.7%Ty Tagami: 0.3%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic1.7%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.7%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Ty Tagami: 7.2%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.5%Framing Effect9.2%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.8%Ty Tagami: 6.5%Rough Draft Atlanta: 3.0%Optimism Bias6.8%This article: 3.6%Ty Tagami: 0.7%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.9%Pessimism Bias3.6%This article: 2.8%Ty Tagami: 1.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 3.0%Negativity Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.8%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Ty Tagami: 2.9%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.1%Halo Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.7%Ty Tagami: 2.2%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.6%Recency Bias8.7%This article: 3.1%Ty Tagami: 0.6%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.2%Primacy Effect3.1%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 25.2%Ty Tagami: 6.5%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.0%Appeal to Authority25.2%This article: 2.1%Ty Tagami: 0.8%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.9%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.5%Ty Tagami: 1.7%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.1%Hasty Generalization8.5%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.5%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.1%Ty Tagami: 1.8%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion4.1%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.9%Ty Tagami: 4.8%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.9%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.5%Ty Tagami: 1.7%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.2%Composition/Division4.5%This article: 2.5%Ty Tagami: 1.4%Rough Draft Atlanta: 1.4%Anecdotal2.5%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.4%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.5%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 2.8%Ty Tagami: 3.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 2.6%Biased Writer Voice2.8%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 1.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ty Tagami: 0.0%Rough Draft Atlanta: 7.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

750 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers53%attributed speech349writer words
Selected voice

Hedy Chang

100%flagged-word coverage
54 attributed words13% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Hedy Chang: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.