Author summary
ā 41% 10 analyzed articles/videos 7,719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rough Draft Staff results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 6,317 hits . Analysis detected 15,981 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,626 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ā 13% (7,597 of 8,732 authors). This Rough Draft Staff is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Rough Draft Staff
Author details
Total words: 33,626
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles33.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Attempt to Sell a Productā¦ Sitewide 0.5% Author 18.8% 18.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 18.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst