Author summary
33% 2 analyzed articles/videos 737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WSB-TV results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 167 hits . Analysis detected 1,773 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,948 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 47% (5,099 of 9,471 authors). This WSB-TV is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. WSB-TV
Author details
Total words: 2,948
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst