Topic summary
91% 28 analyzed articles/videos 9,578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Nuclear Deal results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 7,986 hits . Analysis detected 58,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,584 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 44% (12,683 of 22,440 topics). This Iran Nuclear Deal is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Iran Nuclear Deal
Topic details
Total words: 49,584
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score28 analyzed articles49.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst