Author summary
92% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,753 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas McEntyre results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 1,782 hits . Analysis detected 13,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,013 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,220 of 9,108 authors). This Nicholas McEntyre is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Nicholas McEntyre
Author details
Total words: 11,013
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst