Author summary
86% 12 analyzed articles/videos 4,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Nesi results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 3,459 hits . Analysis detected 25,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,096 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,920 of 9,215 authors). This Chris Nesi is worse (more manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Chris Nesi
Author details
Total words: 19,096
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles19.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst