Topic summary
82% 63 analyzed articles/videos 61,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Trade results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 17,649 hits . Analysis detected 153,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 255,206 analyzed words across 63 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (22,660 of 24,296 topics). This International Trade is better (less manipulative) than 93.30% of the peer group. International Trade
Topic details
Total words: 255,206
Article count: 63
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score63 analyzed articles255.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst