Topic summary
90% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Insurance results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 2,842 hits . Analysis detected 24,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,531 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,708 of 22,261 topics). This Insurance is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Insurance
Topic details
Total words: 22,531
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score9 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.6% 12.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst