Author summary
72% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thibault Spirlet results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,104 hits . Analysis detected 10,492 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,361 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (4,990 of 8,538 authors). This Thibault Spirlet is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Thibault Spirlet
Author details
Total words: 12,361
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.4% 7.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.7% 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst