Topic summary
67% 26 analyzed articles/videos 24,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Innovation results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 6,882 hits . Analysis detected 85,867 faulty-reasoning hits from 108,111 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (17,962 of 21,866 topics). This Innovation is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group. Innovation
Topic details
Total words: 108,111
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score26 analyzed articles108.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst