Author summary
67%3 analyzed articles/videos2,514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe McKendrick results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,067 hits. Analysis detected 7,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,147 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,253 of 8,592 authors). This Joe McKendrick is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Joe McKendrick
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
51%Joe McKendrick (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,147
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 11.7%11.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 11.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate