Topic summary
⁠85%5 analyzed articles/videos1,533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hiring results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,305 hits. Analysis detected 7,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,872 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (10,027 of 21,653 topics). This Hiring is worse (more manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Hiring
Topic details
Total words: 7,872
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.6%16.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos