Publication summary
4%16 analyzed articles/videos3,131 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wyo4News results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,753 hits. Analysis detected 4,487 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,532 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 39% (336 of 548 publications). This Wyo4News is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Wyo4News
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%The Trace1%
1%BridgeDetroit1%
39%Wyo4News (selected)2%
100%The White House9%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 14,532
Article count: 16
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score16 analyzed articles14.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.4%2.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Publication 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 0.0%0.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.1%0.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 12.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate