Author summary
64%2 analyzed articles/videos4,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Radhika Rajkumar results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 1,677 hits. Analysis detected 13,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,551 of 8,722 authors). This Radhika Rajkumar is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Radhika Rajkumar
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
37%Radhika Rajkumar (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,000
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510036.4% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles18K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos