Topic summary
75% 12 analyzed articles/videos 13,000 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fitness results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 4,596 hits . Analysis detected 40,738 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,576 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (17,261 of 22,261 topics). This Fitness is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. Fitness
Topic details
Total words: 53,576
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score12 analyzed articles53.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst