Author summary
72% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,374 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Herz results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 1,400 hits . Analysis detected 10,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,496 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,251 of 8,704 authors). This Jane Herz is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Jane Herz
Author details
Total words: 13,496
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.0% 10.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 4.0% Halo Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst