Topic summary
43%16 analyzed articles/videos12,204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These First Amendment Rights results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 6,397 hits. Analysis detected 53,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 85,000 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (20,465 of 22,261 topics). This First Amendment Rights is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751008.1% percentile
1.2% BS Score16 analyzed articles85K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Are Copwatchers Journalists? Provocateurs? Or Something Else?2%
ScheerPost64%By ScheerPost51%8/3/2026, 4:52:00 AM
Florida English professor alleges political firing over class reading28%
Salon85%By CK Smith57%8/2/2026, 12:00:28 PM
Are copwatchers journalists? Provocateurs? Or something else?1%
The Real News Network3%By Taya Graham0% Stephen Janis0%7/31/2026, 3:05:10 PM
DOJ Stuns Judge With Inability to Answer “Easy Question” in AI Lawsuit70%
The New Republic77%By Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling79%7/31/2026, 9:40:14 AM
After SCOTUS Ruling, Michigan Agrees To End ‘Talk Therapy’ Ban For Gender-Confused Kids42%
The Federalist94%By Shawn Fleetwood77%7/31/2026, 8:21:39 AM
Rich kids playing revolutionary just ran out of runway30%
Washington Examiner84%By Jay Rogers76%7/31/2026, 6:00:00 AM
Free Press Calls for End to Carr’s Unconstitutional Crusade Against ABC86%
Common Dreams98%By Newswire Editor98%7/30/2026, 2:27:33 PM
Chesterfield schools employee fired for Charlie Kirk comments sues, claiming her First Amendment rights were violated15%
The Richmonder12%By Eleanor Shaw13%7/28/2026, 5:05:57 PM
Lawsuit challenges Texas Tech directives that altered teaching at El Paso medical school46%
El Paso Matters8%By Daniel Perez75%7/21/2026, 6:00:00 AM
Cape Cod influencer sues, says she was barred from JD Vance event because of social media posts mocking VP10%
Boston.com35%By Samantha Genzer21%7/20/2026, 5:00:00 PM