Publication summary
ā 64% 23 analyzed articles/videos 31,578 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ScheerPost results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 13,669 hits . Analysis detected 114,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 150,794 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ā 44% (315 of 556 publications). This ScheerPost is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 150,794
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score23 analyzed articles150.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst