Topic summary
63% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Executive Appointments results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 1,633 hits . Analysis detected 10,608 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,046 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 62% (9,173 of 23,829 topics). This Executive Appointments is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Executive Appointments
Topic details
Total words: 9,046
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 18.1% 18.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst