Author summary
31%5 analyzed articles/videos3,333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Jennings-Brown results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 531 hits. Analysis detected 6,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,332 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 13% (7,672 of 8,774 authors). This Taylor Jennings-Brown is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Taylor Jennings-Brown
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
13%Taylor Jennings-Brown (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,332
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510012.6% percentile
1.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate