Author summary
65% 40 analyzed articles/videos 11,711 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giulia Heyward results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 4,309 hits . Analysis detected 41,972 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,269 analyzed words across 40 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 25% (7,000 of 9,303 authors). This Giulia Heyward is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Giulia Heyward
Author details
Total words: 54,269
Article count: 40
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score40 analyzed articles54.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.1% 6.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst