Topic summary
79% 16 analyzed articles/videos 13,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Infrastructure results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 4,287 hits . Analysis detected 47,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,830 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 27% (18,166 of 24,569 topics). This Energy Infrastructure is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Energy Infrastructure
Topic details
Total words: 55,830
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score16 analyzed articles55.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst