Author summary
97%4 analyzed articles/videos1,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bill Ponton results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,930 hits. Analysis detected 14,557 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,601 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,666 of 8,942 authors). This Bill Ponton is worse (more manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Bill Ponton
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
82%Bill Ponton (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,601
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510081.4% percentile
4.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 21.7%21.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 25.4%25.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 24.7%24.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.5%11.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 9.3%9.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 24.7%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 21.7%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.2%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos