Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Atharva Gosavi results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 680 hits . Analysis detected 2,079 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,958 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,815 authors). This Atharva Gosavi is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Atharva Gosavi
Author details
Total words: 2,958
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 23.0% 23.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 23.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 8.3%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst