Author summary
57% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Piper Heath results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 731 hits . Analysis detected 7,409 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,282 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 18% (7,369 of 8,912 authors). This Piper Heath is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Piper Heath
Author details
Total words: 13,282
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst