Author summary
30% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Eggers results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 935 hits . Analysis detected 6,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,028 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (6,790 of 8,889 authors). This Caroline Eggers is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group. Caroline Eggers
Author details
Total words: 12,028
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst