Topic summary
71% 132 analyzed articles/videos 99,682 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Integrity results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 47,791 hits . Analysis detected 454,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 447,815 analyzed words across 132 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,582 of 21,754 topics). This Election Integrity is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group. Election Integrity
Topic details
Total words: 447,815
Article count: 132
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score132 analyzed articles447.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst