Author summary
83%5 analyzed articles/videos6,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Chidi results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 2,337 hits. Analysis detected 20,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,999 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 44% (5,072 of 8,969 authors). This George Chidi is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
George Chidi
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
0%Michael Fox1%
44%George Chidi (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 21,999
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles22K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.4%9.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate