Author summary
36%1 analyzed article/video1,145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Ambrose (earlier) results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 2,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 44% (5,107 of 9,039 authors). This Tom Ambrose (earlier) is better (less manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group.
Tom Ambrose (earlier)
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Tabitha Mueller1%
44%Tom Ambrose (earlier) (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,580
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510043.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos