Author summary
98%4 analyzed articles/videos4,641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Linkins results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 7,107 hits. Analysis detected 37,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,564 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,636 of 8,570 authors). This Jason Linkins is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Jason Linkins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
81%Jason Linkins (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,564
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510080.9% percentile
4.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 38.3%38.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 13.8%13.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 9.3%9.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.3%13.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 24.2%24.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 38.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 24.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Author 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Author 6.9%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate