Topic summary
83% 16 analyzed articles/videos 11,675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Growth results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 3,202 hits . Analysis detected 44,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,700 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (16,235 of 23,345 topics). This Economic Growth is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Economic Growth
Topic details
Total words: 46,700
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score16 analyzed articles46.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst