Author summary
65% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Layla A. Jones results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 1,386 hits . Analysis detected 7,289 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,706 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (4,016 of 9,471 authors). This Layla A. Jones is worse (more manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Layla A. Jones
Author details
Total words: 8,706
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 8.4% 8.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.0% 9.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst