Topic summary
79% 23 analyzed articles/videos 17,633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department Of Justice results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 10,287 hits . Analysis detected 74,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 77,148 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (16,249 of 23,003 topics). This Department Of Justice is better (less manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group. Department Of Justice
Topic details
Total words: 77,148
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score23 analyzed articles77.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst