Author summary
⁠89%1 analyzed article/video1,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Rosenzweig results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 1,274 hits. Analysis detected 6,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (1,958 of 9,471 authors). This Paul Rosenzweig is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Paul Rosenzweig
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠80%Paul Rosenzweig (selected)4%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,436
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

79% percentile
025507510079.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 28.7%28.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.0%9.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 10.4%10.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.3%7.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 11.7%11.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.7%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos