Author summary
95% 19 analyzed articles/videos 6,221 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Chapman results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 6,835 hits . Analysis detected 47,646 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,345 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,764 of 9,201 authors). This Matthew Chapman is worse (more manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Matthew Chapman
Author details
Total words: 31,345
Article count: 19
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.0% percentile 3.0% BS Score19 analyzed articles31.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.3% 16.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.4% 6.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst