Topic summary
83% 11 analyzed articles/videos 9,610 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Counter Terrorism results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 5,479 hits . Analysis detected 51,027 faulty-reasoning hits from 51,379 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (16,216 of 24,545 topics). This Counter Terrorism is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Counter Terrorism
Topic details
Total words: 51,379
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles51.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst