The Intercept85%
Rubio Is Trying to Keep Leftists Out of U.S. by Banning Supporters of “Economic Sabotage” 58%
By Matt Sledge81%
8/8/2026, 3:06:00 AM
BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Pessimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 288 hits. Analysis detected 1,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,064 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.5% and a BS Rank of 58% (13,073 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the article peer group.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced last month a policy banning visas for foreigners accused of links to “far-left terrorism.”
The policy cited Donald Trump’s National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 as well as the law Rubio used to try to deport the pro-Palestine activist Mahmoud Khalil .
More than three weeks later, however, it’s not clear how Rubio and the State Department intend to use the policy.
Their silence since the announcement has left some advocates wondering if the policy is really just a public-relations push by the Trump administration.
Existing law already allows the State Department to block terrorists from visiting the U.S.
But tucked inside the policy is language about “economic sabotage” that advocates worry could empower a broad crackdown against people associated with the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement and campaigns to divest from fossil fuels.
“The message is to the public at large and particularly to anybody who would disagree with the government’s policies that they should tread carefully, lest they be considered a member or aligned with what the government considers to be a far-left terrorist group,” said Carrie DeCell, a senior staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute.
“I think the vagueness is the point.
It’s intended to send a broad chilling effect through the public and discourage dissent.”
Rubio’s Right-Wing Fever Dream
Rubio announced the policy at a July 16 gathering of foreign diplomats where he played up the threat of what he called “far-left terrorism,” which he said had been overlooked after the September 11, 2001, attacks.
“For far too long, however, our counterterrorism doctrine has had a blind spot — a blind spot when it comes to extremist violence from the political left.
Even today, the very idea that far-left terrorism could be a serious threat is treated as a right-wing fever dream, or worse, as a dangerous fascist conspiracy,” Rubio said.
In a press release, Rubio said that State Department officials had been instructed to deny visas to “members of Far-Left Terrorist and other aligned groups who have supported or incited acts of terrorism; supported violent criminal activity; participated in economic sabotage; financed, recruited, or provided logistical support for violent or criminal actions committed by Far-Left Terrorist and other aligned groups; and/or facilitated the convergence of Far-Left Terrorist and other aligned networks for the purposes of violent action.”
The State Department has not elaborated further on how it decides whether a foreign national is a member of a “far-left” terror group or “aligned” groups.
The department did not answer questions from The Intercept about its definitions for those terms.
“The worry is that this will be used who are already in this country, for example, foreign students.”
The policy raised major concerns, however, for Peter Margulies, a law professor at Roger Williams University.
Nothing in the policy appears to restrict it to foreign nationals residing abroad, Margulies said.
He is concerned that the State Department could attempt to apply it to students living in the U.S. or to other people with legal status who are applying for different visas or renewals.
“The worry is that this will be used who are already in this country, for example, foreign students,” he said.
“This gives the administration a hammer to go after these people, that I think is problematic under the First Amendment, and also exceeds the authority that Secretary Rubio has.”
Judge Finds Rubio and Noem Intentionally Targeted Pro-Palestine Activists to Chill Speech
Other parts of federal immigration law already give the government wide discretion to block people accused of links to terrorism, making it something of a puzzle why the government would need a new policy to block people accused more specifically of “far-left” terrorism.
Yet one provision of the policy appears to mark a shift from existing policy, Margulies said: a section singling out people accused of “economic sabotage.”
That kind of language could be used to target people who have supported Palestinian calls for the boycott of Israel, or environmental activists protesting fossil fuel companies , he said.
“That’s a term broad enough to get a tank through, and so that would really be problematic under the First Amendment, because of course people in this country have a right to criticize corporations as well as government,” he said.
Read our complete coverage
The Vagueness Is the Point
When Rubio announced a new policy last May targeting misinformation researchers for visa denials, the State Department followed up seven months later by announcing that it would block or deport five foreign nationals.
So far the State Department has not announced any visa denials under the latest policy.
For an example of the type of people that Rubio considers to be supporters of far-left terrorism, DeCell pointed to a State Department report about Cuba’s influence network issued last month.
That report named streamer Hasan Piker, Amazon Labor Union founder Christian Smalls, the National Lawyers Guild , and the Democratic Socialists of America.
Baher Azmy, the legal director at the Center for Constitutional Rights, said it was possible that the new visa restriction policy is simply another part of the multipronged effort to build up the threat of the left ahead of the midterms.
“This is coming at the same time they’re starting this once moribund terrorist court , they’re calling Amy Goodman a far-left enemy of the state,” he said.
“It might be a midterm strategy, because it does seem to be coming all at once.”
DeCell’s group recently won an injunction blocking the State Department from implementing its visa restriction policy against misinformation researchers.
She expects the State Department to eventually get around to announcing visa denials, as it did with them.
“The justifications for their targeting likely would be made on X, if it follows the same path,” she said.
When it does, the latest restrictions could also be vulnerable to legal challenge.
While the State Department has broad discretion to deny visas to foreigners, Margulies said, it is not unlimited, particularly for those living in the United States.
“Watch this space.
They may have particular people in mind.
Then we may see some developments very quickly how they intend to apply this,” he said.
The post Rubio Is Trying to Keep Leftists Out of U.S. by Banning Supporters of “Economic Sabotage” appeared first on The Intercept .
Speakers
4speakers52%attributed speech516writer words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageCarrie DeCell
164 attributed words30% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.