Topic summary
72% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Visa Policy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 836 hits . Analysis detected 6,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,316 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 45% (13,692 of 24,545 topics). This Visa Policy is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Visa Policy
Topic details
Total words: 7,316
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.2% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst