Topic summary
90% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,386 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Spending results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,984 hits . Analysis detected 19,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,679 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 38% (15,373 of 24,545 topics). This Consumer Spending is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group. Consumer Spending
Topic details
Total words: 22,679
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.8%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst