Author summary
24% 1 analyzed article/video 935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HIKARI MAE HIDA results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 194 hits . Analysis detected 1,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 30% (6,715 of 9,471 authors). This HIKARI MAE HIDA is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. HIKARI MAE HIDA
Author details
Total words: 3,740
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Composition/Division: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst