Topic summary
49% 10 analyzed articles/videos 7,556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cdc results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 4,145 hits . Analysis detected 18,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,294 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 11% (21,163 of 23,589 topics). This Cdc is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Cdc
Topic details
Total words: 32,294
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.3% percentile 1.2% BS Score10 analyzed articles32.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst